To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6861
6860  |  6862
Subject: 
Re: Something not right about Captain Ahnee and the Dipwads?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 3 Nov 2000 12:11:40 GMT
Viewed: 
74 times
  
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
news:G3G5H4.4yy@lugnet.com...

Call me a stick in the mud, and this may be an unpopular viewpoint.

"Stick in the mud"? Have to learn more english ;-)

I looked at this, and I looked at the earlier "Mark goes for donuts". I
laughed a lot, both times. (I laughed at the E! jarjar mockumentary too.)
LOTS of talent went into making these graphic comics, there is no denying
that.

I also laughted a lot, until i reached to the pictures of brutal violence.
It was to rought to be funny, in my eyes.

And to a certain extent, all humor centers around the discomfiture,
misfortune, or embarrassment of others or of ourselves.

But is a storyline in which the protagonists either ignore injustice or
actively participate in it... is that storyline "good"? Is it funny, • really,
to see the suffering of another who is being victimized because of his
appearance, language, or (in Jar Jar's case, he's not very bright) mental
handicap?

Well, it can be funny if it's done right.
(Monthy Pyton gang was good at it)

I just don't know. That's why I followed this up to off-topic.debate. I
expect I am going to get some replies that say "lighten up, it's all in
fun". Heck, I sort of feel that way myself. Something here is making me a
bit queasy, I can't claim that I have come to grips with it exactly. There
are no good guys, per se, in the strip, so we can't say the good guys are
doing bad things...

Talented as this work is, and as much as it made me laugh, I am not sure I
want to see a bunch of other works that all "celebrate" intolerance. or
something.

Jar Jar is a sentient being (of a fantasy world) and I suspect he has • rights
and doesn't like being beat up because he talks funny or looks funny. He
didn't CHOOSE to look goofy, did he?

On the other hand, who am I to say what sort of work other people should
create or not create? I dunno.

I really do not like the "Kill Timmy" pages either.
Maybe I'm getting old, 32....
/Joakim



1 Message in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR