To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 684
683  |  685
Subject: 
Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 21:22:05 GMT
Viewed: 
2661 times
  
Todd Lehman wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, sls@jane-villa.demon.co.uk (Steve Scott)
> writes:
> > [...]
> > If standard auctions were restricted (by ruling or agreed etiquette) to a
> > single seller, then the problem could not arise.  This is what I'm hoping
> > will evolve from discussions.
> 
> Steve, could you go into a bit more detail here?  I don't understand what
> you mean by restricting auctions to a single seller.  Do you mean
> restricting auction threads to a single poster (the seller)?


That was the idea, yes.  Problem is, in the interim period since my original
post I'm not so convinced that it was a good idea.  It now sees to me that
this type of system would prove restrictive to the development of a stock
market type system - a far more exciting prospect IMO.

> > Conversely, in the case of a reverse
> > auction - let's take Todd's orange buckets as an example:
> > 
> > Todd is close to reaching the lowest likely seller price when I • "parasite"
> > him and post on "his" thread that I will buy the buckets at a higher • price.
> > The reverse auction is hijacked, it turns into a standard auction with • Todd
> > and I bidding against each other with the likely exclusion of all but one • of
> > the sellers.  It is also feasible that the sellers would try to outbid • each
> > other for the attention of the two (or who knows even more) buyers.  End
> > result - chaos!
> 
> Chaos maybe in terms of sifting through the sea of data and bids, but
> heck, this sort of situation is really quite natural.  On the one side you
> have multiple buyers competing against each other over a finite supply,
> and other the other side you have multiple sellers competing against each
> other over a finite demand.  The more buyers you have, the higher the
> price climbs.  The more sellers you have, the lower the price descends.
> Someday here we'll have buy and sell orders just like the stock market.
> It'll be so chaotic that it won't even seem chaotic anymore.

There speaks the voice of a man with an *automated* auction system :)
I stand by my earlier prediction of uncontrollable chaos for the rest of us!

> --Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
 
-----Original Message----- From: Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> Newsgroups: lugnet.off-topic.debate Date: 05 March 1999 23:07 Subject: Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge) (...) I take your point that (...) (28 years ago, 6-Mar-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR