 | | Re: A little self examination? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | (...) Aye. And remember, this is a discussion forum. Some very good posts don't lend themselves to further discussion, and so don't get much (or any) follow-up. And some very crummy posts get tons of followup. (...) Not that it's wrong either. Trust (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A little self examination? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'm going to go out on a limb here and say this... there is *nothing wrong* with being elitist... as long as it's a meritocracy. In large part, that *is* the way things operate in a lot of groups, there are people who most people know are (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A little self examination? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Three cheers for compartmentalized dorks! >;-D -John (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A little self examination? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I don't think is the right group for that... Steve (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A little self examination? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, couldn't resist when I saw the word "compartmentalisation". I'm sure you remember that little flap in RTL about a year ago... Actually, the post was just simply my little way of posting "I agree". Unless you want to argue whether my (...) (24 years ago, 21-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A little self examination? —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) Sorry, I just left off the winkey. ;) It takes a compartmentalized dork to argue about the right place to celebrate compartmentalized dork-dom. :) Steve (24 years ago, 23-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A little self examination? —John Neal
|
| | | | (...) :-) Thanks for the chuckle, Steve! -John (...) (24 years ago, 26-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
