Subject:
|
Re: which threads, ethics (was: Re: Mini Auction - 6273 - Rock Island Refuge)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 18:00:57 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
c576653@*stopspam*cclabs.missouri.edu
|
Viewed:
|
1087 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 02:04:07 GMT, "James Brown"
> <galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote:
>
> > (That being said) I don't think it is unethical. BMS, (1) unethical would be
> > e-mailing the high bidder, and telling him you'll sell him one for less
> > instead. That would be asking someone to back out of an implied(written?
> > spoken? electronic?) contract. You're just one of the hazards of dealing in a
> > free market. :)
>
> If i were to email the high bidder with such an offer, I would expect
> him to honor his bid. I wouldn't expect him to outbid the next bidder,
> if someone raises his offer, though. I have been in such a situation
> before, and honored my bid. It's really just one of the hazards of
> bidding in any auction, hell of buying anything: there's always the
> chance that you'll find a cheaper one the very next day. when that
> happens, of course, you can _try_ to return the box to TRU for a
> refund,
Or, you can do business at places that do retroactive price matching.
When last we bought a television, we purchased it at Circus City and
found at on sale a Dillard's (their last one) the next day. We went
back to CC and got a refund of the difference + 10% or some such. I
know this is an exception and applies less well to Lego, but there are
lots of options, and I agree that buying something is fraught with the
peril of then finding it cheaper.
--
Sincerely,
Christopher L. Weeks
central Missouri, USA
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
101 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
