Subject:
|
Re: Frog
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 11 Feb 1999 22:34:17 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
(lpien@IWANTNOSPAM)antispam(.ctp.com)
|
Viewed:
|
698 times
|
| |
|
|
"Christopher L. Weeks" wrote:
> > I probably will try not to respond to any responses to this, but I did
>
> Oh, you can make time for this...It's just a job ;-)
No, I can't. Sorry. Fascinating but no time.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Frog
|
| Larry Pieniazek wrote: [It's OK to use critter who aren't aware in a meaningful way] (...) I wonder what potentially sentient means. Capable of being 'uplifted?' As steve bliss points out, it is commonly accepted that even domesticated porcine are (...) (26 years ago, 10-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
