 | | Re: Frog
|
| (...) In this particular case, it's because it was boron. Steve (26 years ago, 11-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Frog
|
| (...) Boron? :-) My .02... I thought it was rather bad myself. It looked good, and parts of it were cool, but afterward I left feeling a little cheated. And even more telling, my nephew (10 at the time) said it sucked. And that surprised me. He (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Frog
|
| Terry K wrote in message <36c3bfe8.6485570@lu...et.com>... (...) of it (...) He (...) Well, I'll agree that it could have been a whole lot more. I think if the directors had taken a different approach it would have been a lot better. I think they (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Frog
|
| (...) Hydrogen, helium, lithium, beryllium (had to look that one up), boron. --Steve (URL) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Frog
|
| (...) I was just smiling because you are periodically amusing. -- Terry K -- (26 years ago, 13-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Frog
|
| (...) I figured you did. I thought others might not. BTW, I stole the pun from somewhere, but I don't remember where. It could even have been RTL. I'd add another pun, but I'm no good at them. Steve (26 years ago, 15-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
