To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 4803
4802  |  4804
Subject: 
Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 12 Mar 2000 02:43:45 GMT
Viewed: 
1751 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Todd Lehman writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bill Farkas writes:
Thank God we have the Bible so that [we] don't have to use our minds.

Thanks Todd, that one gave me a huge chuckle. :~)

I wasn't saying that we shouldn't think. What I meant was that our own minds
are incapable of true objectivity. [...]

Aha!  OK, thanks for clarifying.  I wasn't aware, prior to your pointing it
out, that the good book was truly objective.  I mean, I always knew it was
completely factual, accurate, and consistent, but I never knew that it was
truly objective.

--Todd

How do you talk with your tongue stuck in your cheek all the time? You sure
have the gift of sarcasm. I never said any of those things either. Each time I
have referenced a bible verse it was to clarify the meaning of said verse which
may or may not have been used out of context elsewhere. I believe it to be all
of those things for myself, with the caveat that time and translation has
opened the door to interpolations among manuscript evidences.

Bill



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
 
(...) I'm sorry, I didn't glean that. Maybe I'm reading too quickly, or have been adversely influenced by too many bible proponents in the past. I didn't realize you were intending your statements to be taken that they apply personally to you and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Does God have a monopoly on gods?
 
(...) Aha! OK, thanks for clarifying. I wasn't aware, prior to your pointing it out, that the good book was truly objective. I mean, I always knew it was completely factual, accurate, and consistent, but I never knew that it was truly objective. (...) (25 years ago, 12-Mar-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

541 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR