 | | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Frank Filz writes: (case study #1) (...) Corporation, yes. CEO? This is obviously where we are disagreeing. How can liability be assigned essentially at random to an individual? Why the CEO and not some other company (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
|
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) find (...) the (...) can (...) and (...) but (...) employee's (...) if (...) The liability need only be assigned to the CEO if he is unable to make a satisfactory assignment. Also, in this case, I think all we (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
|
(...) OK. That makes a *HUGE* difference from the arguements I was seeing earlier. The arguements I was seeing to date lead me to believe you (collective) were arguing "punish the CEO, then the company" <snipppage> (...) Ok. Going from that basis (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Corporate vs Individual liability
|
|
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) is (...) Well, the owbers or stockholders are responsible also, though in many cases a stockholder's responsibility is less since he isn't directly running the company they way the CEO is. (...) refuses (...) (...) (24 years ago, 27-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
