Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:48:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2363 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 01:45:31 GMT, "James Brown"
<galliard@shades-of-night.com> wrote:
> Hmm. That's not quite what I was getting at - I'm in favor of personal
> responsibility and liability, in a general sense. However, in a large
> organization, I don't think it's necessarily a good idea. If company officers
> are suddenly liable, I don't think it will lead to better work processes, I
> think it will lead to increased paperwork, disclaimers/disavowals, and a
> general increase in the use of smoke and mirrors.
Which is exactly what is already happening with the increased threat
of litigation and the _very_real_ possibility, nay certainty, of
getting fired if someone can prove, or even intimate, that you were
the cause of such an incident.
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) <snipped example - I could counter it, but that would lead to wheel-spinning> (...) Hmm. That's not quite what I was getting at - I'm in favor of personal responsibility and liability, in a general sense. However, in a large organization, I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
