Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:50:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2328 times
|
| |
|
|
Frank Filz wrote:
>
> minor and temporary (i.e. if you wait 5 years to sue over the loss of a
> single days work back then, sorry, on the other hand, if 20 years down the
> line, science is finally able to identify that the chemical that company X
> spilled was the cause of 100 deaths, the officers of company X (at that
> time) should be held responsible, the company itself should also be held
> responsible).
Ack! I don't like that. I'm a strong supporter of the idea of personal
liability, but that ranks as an accident, if I understand you.
We believe (don't we?) that the herb, rosemary is safe, so we dispose of
it willy nilly. Twenty years from now it turns out that some exotic
organic compound contained in the rosemary stem is carcinogenic, does
that mean that everyone who's composted their rosemary stems is a criminal?
That's very different than trying to sneak barrels of
1,3-methylethylketone into the public compost heap.
Or did I miss something?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) think (...) For things done while they were in power, sure. Although I'm not sure how statute of limitations should play in, though the only things which should have a statute of limitations are things for (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
