To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3688
3687  |  3689
Subject: 
Re: Libertarian stuff
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 13 Jan 2000 20:47:56 GMT
Viewed: 
3490 times
  
Dave Schuler wrote in message ...
>  Oh, it's hopeless, but not for the reasons you imply.  If Libertarians • (and
> I recognize that you've never asserted yourself to be an expert on
> Libertarianism) can't plead their case successfully here among • middle-of-the-
> roaders, most of whom pay a sizable tax percentage and few if any of whom
> receive significant government assistance, how can you realistically expect • to
> receive a hearing in the public forum?  I'm a Moderate, and you haven't
> convinced me!  Can you really hope to persuade anyone with a more Liberal • view
> than mine?

   Your a moderate what?

>  Further, I know I've never claimed Liberama to be anarchy, and those here
> who have claimed it to be have done so in a favorable light by elevating
> anarchy to the status of the ultimate in mature anti-govermental society. • So
> in that case, you're right:  Liberama is nothing like anarchy.

   Good memory.  And sadly, you (actually Jasper said this first) "aren't
anywhere near ready for it" may be true.

>  Once again Liberama tries to place the burden of proof on its opposition.
> I've read the whole thread from the outset, and it still hasn't convinced
me.

  Not quite, just that none of us have had the time to go back to square -37
(as opposed to square 1 where we tried to begin, but you (1) were already
lost) and bring you up to speed.

>     Dave!

1 - in the plural
--
   Have fun!
   John
The Legos you've been dreaming of...
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/lego
my weird Lego site:
http://www114.pair.com/ig88/



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Libertarian stuff
 
(...) Liberama is disqualified because it relies on the assumption that in its great society people and corporations will be motivated by higher ethics and community responsibility--an assumption which is fine on paper but has never come close to (...) (27 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR