 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Scott Edward Sanburn
| | | | (...) Minority as in a small part. Sorry, I thought you were saying minority as in African American, etc. My mistake. (...) Interesting, but I disagree with it, simply because the government enforces it. (...) That would contradict the entire world (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —James Brown
| | | | | | (...) I've been avoiding this debate, since there seem to be a lot of personal stuff flying about, but The above is one of the principle things that I can't quite fathom about libertarian thinking. Why is it that "government will take advantage of (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?] —Richard Franks
| | | | | (...) It would just be something new, something unthought of, not contradictory. (...) I said that there are people who find less money makes them feel freer. Whether or not they are delusional is a different matter. Anyway - that isn't even almost (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
