Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:19:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1466 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo wrote:
> More silliness, but couldn't the Red Cross hire mercenaries if it thought
> it was the right thing to do? If people here thought it was the right thing
> to do, wouldn't they still donate to the Red Cross? I think thats much more
> likely than you think, and at least then our (the donor's) intervention
> would be for good causes, and not to promote someone's election.
I think this would be a very bad thing for the Red Cross to do. The Red
Cross gets a lot of respect because it remains neutral in conflicts.
That doesn't mean that other organizations wouldn't do well to do this.
Of course current US poilicy would really frown on this, especially if
it thinks the organization is a terrorist organization.
--
Frank Filz
-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
