Subject:
|
Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 Jan 2000 00:02:49 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org/Spamless/
|
Viewed:
|
1273 times
|
| |
|
|
John DiRienzo <ig88888888@stlnet.com> wrote:
> So people who smoke crack are bad? Don't you? You act like it.
HEY. That is totally uncalled for. There's no reason to be calling me names.
And it makes me respect you a lot less.
But, to answer your question:
Althought may I sound flippant, for which I apologize, I'm totally serious.
People who smoke crack (and they do exist) aren't necessary bad. But they
are necessarily bad parents -- very likely to the point where they won't be
able to work off debts to pay for anything, let alone a kid's education.
That sucks for the kid. What about that situation makes it so he or she
deserves less of a chance than the child of parents who where more
responsible?
> and his food). If he is a good parent, he won't go to jail, or be required
> to pay any debt not incurred.
Again, I'm not asking about the parent. I'm asking about the kid. (Although
I do think there are serious issues with how to deal with highly addictive
substances in a libertarian society, that's a seperate issue.)
> If you would try to comprehend these ideas rather than acting an obnoxious
> buffoon regarding everything that you read, you might do yourself some
> good.
More name calling. Geesh.
> --
> Have fun!
> John
Hey look. Maybe taking your own advice wouldn't hurt.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
