Debate : 3498


Off-Topic / Debate / 3498	3497 \| 3499

Subject:	Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:29:44 GMT
Viewed:	1201 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes: > It might not be an improvement, but it'll certainly be an issue. 'Cause > without the government telling corporations they can't, a lot of food > products could very easily have a new secret ingredient. Oh, sure, people > might vote with their checkbooks and boycott crack-laced foods once it came > to light -- but not if they've tried them once. And Coka Cola would finally win the tasteaddictionMORE challenge... Richard

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) Didn't the original Coca-Cola have cocaine in it, for that extra midday boost (1), when it first came out? 1) Original advertisement, which I saw, many moons ago! Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net Systems (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) "Now back to the _old_ old formula!" Jasper (24 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) It might not be an improvement, but it'll certainly be an issue. 'Cause without the government telling corporations they can't, a lot of food products could very easily have a new secret ingredient. Oh, sure, people might vote with their (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

209 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search