 | | Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | <Fo1y8z.Mr9@lugnet.com> <38781DD3.4545ED6B@voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Fostered by government? If so, only fostered by the government's complicity with the banking/savings and loan (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) Are you _sure_ you're talking about the 1929 crash, and not the 2002 crash? Jasper (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) Could be either, but there are SEC restrictions on speculation now that would prevent the free-fall of 1929. 1997/8 in Indonesia/East Asia could have done the same thing as 1929, except that the response was very different--in part because we (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Libitarian guff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) with (...) Wait, are you saying that the S&L problem wasn't directly caused and directly made worse by Government? Let's review, the FSLIC is a GOVERNMENT agency that charges each and every S&L the SAME premium no matter what the risk profile (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
