Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 15:23:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.SPAMLESSorg
|
Viewed:
|
2620 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> Making it dynamic, and gatewayed to lugnet without Todd's consent is
> pretty much impossible.
I disagree technically. It's almost impossible to make something available
to the general public yet block copying it.
But I conceed that there _is_ an essential difference between LUGnet and a
book -- the dynamic interaction you mention, plus the basic fact that there
is a community here. I can make a copy, and keep it constantly updated, but
it still won't be the original. Whereas an electronic copy of a book _is_
the original.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) Yes. But doing so without Todd's knowledge, _while keeping it up tom date_, is next to impossible. I suspect somebody who downloaded the entire site would show up a significant blip in traffic, also. Then there is the fact that by far not (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than copying an electronic novel would be. But, there are other things that might be better (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
