Subject:
|
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 14:25:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2381 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000 22:16:57 GMT, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller)
wrote:
> It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical
> ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than
> copying an electronic novel would be.
No, we wouldn't, and yes, it would be.
Only a snapshot is easy to make. Copying the entire underlying
structure of dynamical pages would not be trivial, but not hard either
(since Todd speaks of it fairly freely, and much material is
available). Copying the entire forum structure into an NNTP-based
database would be less trivial, but still not very hard.
Making it dynamic, and gatewayed to lugnet without Todd's consent is
pretty much impossible.
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
| (...) It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than copying an electronic novel would be. But, there are other things that might be better (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
