To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3353
3352  |  3354
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 02:45:08 GMT
Viewed: 
2599 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote:
user participation occurs at a different rate for Todd than for a novelist.
Further, since electronic novels _would_ be copied and distributed freely,
and Lugnet has not been, you must recognize that any author who distributed
his

It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical
ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than
copying an electronic novel would be.

  Another reason no one's done it is that there's no point--Lugnet's value
isn't as static repository of ideas but as a living forum for exchange of those
ideas.  A novel is different, since it's written once and then it's
done--downloading the novel doesn't risk missing out on later development to
the novel, as would be the case if one downloaded Lugnet and never came back.

But, there are other things that might be better examples. Open source
software, for one. Still protected by copyright, of course, but freely
distributable. And people are certainly making money from it.

  I'm not as familiar with those--what does the copyright stipulate?  And in
any case, even if an on-line novel is protected by copyright, I have no doubt
that it would still be copied and distributed.

     Dave!






Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) It varies. Probably the most interesting open source/free software license is the GPL (GNU General Public License), which states (in as watertight manner as a bunch of lawyers could make it) that the software is free to use and modify as long (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than copying an electronic novel would be. But, there are other things that might be better (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR