To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 3353
3352  |  3354
Subject: 
Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 7 Jan 2000 02:45:08 GMT
Viewed: 
5139 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Matthew Miller writes:
> Dave Schuler <orrex@excite.com> wrote:
> > user participation occurs at a different rate for Todd than for a novelist.
> > Further, since electronic novels _would_ be copied and distributed freely,
> > and Lugnet has not been, you must recognize that any author who distributed
> > his

> It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical
> ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than
> copying an electronic novel would be.

  Another reason no one's done it is that there's no point--Lugnet's value
isn't as static repository of ideas but as a living forum for exchange of those
ideas.  A novel is different, since it's written once and then it's
done--downloading the novel doesn't risk missing out on later development to
the novel, as would be the case if one downloaded Lugnet and never came back.

> But, there are other things that might be better examples. Open source
> software, for one. Still protected by copyright, of course, but freely
> distributable. And people are certainly making money from it.

  I'm not as familiar with those--what does the copyright stipulate?  And in
any case, even if an on-line novel is protected by copyright, I have no doubt
that it would still be copied and distributed.

     Dave!


> 



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) It varies. Probably the most interesting open source/free software license is the GPL (GNU General Public License), which states (in as watertight manner as a bunch of lawyers could make it) that the software is free to use and modify as long (...) (27 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) It's interesting though. A lot of us here certainly would have the technical ability to copy and redistribute lugnet -- it's not that much harder than copying an electronic novel would be. But, there are other things that might be better (...) (27 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR