Subject:
|
Re: Swearing?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 5 Jan 2000 02:16:34 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.orgNOSPAM
|
Viewed:
|
1811 times
|
| |
|
|
Christopher Weeks <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote:
> 1. It must be intentional. (a beautiful sunset is not art)
> 2. It must provoke emotion in some/most viewers. (it need not be a
> pleasant response)
> 3. It must be explainable. (this is pretty fuzzy)
Something which sums up all of this is, and a definition I use, is:
"art is expression which communicates at an emotional level".
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Swearing?
|
| Hi all, (...) I spent six years and 30 college credits taking art classes and spent a fair amount of time thinking about this issue. To my mind, some, but possibly not all, of the criteria are: 1. It must be intentional. (a beautiful sunset is not (...) (25 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
