Subject:
|
Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 29 Dec 1998 18:03:15 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.STOPSPAMMERSiwantnospam.com
|
Viewed:
|
976 times
|
| |
|
|
Matt Hanson wrote:
> Well, you seem to have overlooked the part I wrote about considerations
> of others... I think that dishonesty, of any kind, should be able to be
> punished by law. I don't really care whose business it is. You take a
> vow to *anyone,* you are entering a contract agreement, and it doesn't
> matter what perspective you look at it from. A promise, is a promise.
But a promise to do what? I agree, people should be held to promises
they make of their free will. But the government has a monopoly on
granting marriage and constrains who can be married and under what
terms. I will not hold a group of people to the terms of the marriage
ceremony if they make it clear that they actually intended another deal
and can prove it.
Contracts must be sancrosanct, but not those that are entered into under
duress, or that do not capture the sense of the parties agreement.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Geez, its hard to stomach all of this
|
| (...) Divorce, in my opinion, ought to entail some sort of punishment on both sides, to discourage the practice, or to make people think harder about marriage. (another abused institution) (...) Well, you seem to have overlooked the part I wrote (...) (26 years ago, 29-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
118 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
