Subject:
|
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 2 Jan 2000 03:22:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1564 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 01:43:56 GMT, Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net>
wrote:
> Jasper Janssen wrote:
>
> > I've had 220V AC shocks more
> > than once (fairly much more than once, actually), but they were never
> > more than instaneous.
>
> And if that isn't an argument against electroshock therapy I don't know
> what is! The above explains a lot <GD&R>.
Indeed. I knew I was leaving myself wide open to exactly that
response, but I wondered who was going to make it. Shoulda known. ;)
BTW, you realise that EST is quite different from a mild 220/50 shock?
I've also heard at various times that 110/60 is actually more
dangerous than 220/50, due to it beincg closer to the resonant
frequency of $BODY_PART (presumably heart, or nerve, or whatever).
Jasper
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
