Subject:
|
Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Dec 1999 02:29:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1229 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> Let me say this again (I'll type slowly so you can get it easier;) only God
> is good. Yeah, I know, some people *seem* good and some more than others,
> but when you get right down to it, all people are motivated by fear,
> selfishness, pride, greed, or some combination of all. Saying someone is
> basically good basically means nothing. Either one is or isn't. Goodness
> implies perfection, which we aren't (Lar notwithstanding;)
>
> I would rather consider myself imperfect while striving for perfection than
> think myself perfect and have everyone know I'm not. And BTW, Christians
> aren't perfect, they are just trying to find their way like everyone else.
> The difference is that they are following the way of Jesus; not just
> stumbling around in the dark without direction.
Wow. You have a fairly radical definition of good, it seems. I tend to think
of good as 'not meaning harm', but that's a very loose and general definition -
don't try to pin me to specifics, please. "Good" in my books is almost
entirely subjective.
I tend to think that (by the above) most people are good, most of the time.
However, I also think most people are lazy, even when it is clearly in their
benefit not to be. This is why I think a Libertarian system would be doomed to
failure - it requires too much effort from the individual.
$0.02
James
http://www.shades-of-night.com/lego/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
