Subject:
|
Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 19:57:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
448 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Edward Sanburn writes:
>
> The judge in this case, when it started (Saw it on CNN), had to have the
> attorneys demonstrate how to operate and use a computer. And yet he is
> supposed to understand the dynamics of this case? I'm sorry, that is a factor
> to consider.
IIRC (and I am pretty darn sure I am), he had them demonstrate how a computer
could function/not function with out IE installed. Again, IIRC, the Microsoft
attorneys couldn't demonstrate conclusively that removing IE had any adverse
effects. In fact, I think it came out that they were using a rigged computer.
Jeff
P.S. I believe I read this on CNET's News.com, and I am just relaying what I
know, I don't want to get involved in the actual debate. Have Fun! :)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
| Jasper, (...) Well, considering the law in this case is something crafted against monopolies, which IMHO, Microsoft did not do. When you lower prices on items, and produce a product, instead of raising prices, it is bad law. I think this whole case (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
188 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
