 | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Richie Dulin
| | | | (...) Just a point of order, Dave: I didn't include a question in my initial post. Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —John Neal
| | | | | | (...) But you brought their judgment into question. Semantics here, IMO JOHN (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Allister McLaren
| | | | | | | | (...) And god forbid that anyone gets accused of being anti-Semantic. a (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —John Neal
| | | | | | | | | (...) Well, it looks like the same antics to me. (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Richie Dulin
| | | | | | | (...) Right. Semantics, that must be it. Even so, even if that was what Dave was meaning, it would be nice for him to have the used the phrase "Richie's comment" or "Richie's post". It would save you the hassle of having to explain this stuff to me, (...) (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Dave Schuler
| | | | | (...) You keep out of this. I'll decide what you did and didn't say! ;) Dave! (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Arkham Asylum - A cool set, but a bit disturbing. —Richie Dulin
| | | | | (...) Fair enough. Actually, I find it a lot more convincing as points of view go than the semantics one. ;) Cheers Richie Dulin (17 years ago, 8-Jun-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
