 | | Re: Adventurer Maps —Jeff Thompson
| | | | (...) mistaken. (...) If (...) Occam's razor: (URL) should not increase, beyond what is necessary, the number of entities required to explain anything" No reason to add aliens into the mix to explain the pinacles of ancient human achievements. (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Adventurer Maps —Michael Horvath
| | | | | | (...) You're right. It is insulting. But, it makes great fiction : ) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Adventurer Maps —John DiRienzo
| | | | | Nephilim wrote in message ... (...) the (...) and (...) the (...) we? (...) it (...) I find this interesting. I didn't check the link, but the quote above has a certain je ne sais quoi. While it sounds good, its not believable. Just because five (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
