Subject:
|
Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jan 2007 18:21:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2900 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
> > > Gonzales: I meant by that comment that the Constitution doesn't say that every
> > > individual in the United States or every citizen has or is assured the right of
> > > habeas corpus. It doesn't say that. It simply says that the right of habeas
> > > corpus shall not be suspended.
> > >
> > > Hmmmm, founding fathers being exclusionary? The literal text really does say
> > > what Gonzales says it does.
> >
> > Yeah, I don't get it. Has he seriously not corrected himself yet? It only seems
> > fair that he be arrested and imprisoned for no reason.
>
> That's the way he sees it anyway--I think some sherrif should put it to the test
> and walk up to him with some handcuffs...
...Nah, he wouldn't be able to. RoboCop's prime directive doesn't allow him to
take action against an employee or board member of Halliburton or any of its
subsidiaries, such as the U.S. Federal Government.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
115 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
