 | | Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Bruce Hietbrink
| | | | Hey Brendan, I appreciate the fact that you added the final two illustrations to the Canaanite woman story. I think that it was right to do so, as to leave those out seriously misrepresented the story. While your commentary on how everyone selects (...) (19 years ago, 6-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Brendan Powell Smith
| | | | | Hi, Bruce. Thanks for the comments on this matter, too. I will probably redo the Acts story as part of my revamp of the New Testament part of the site, and will add the missing panels there as well. I think it's not just that it would be (...) (19 years ago, 7-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty —Stephen Bishop
| | | | | Just wanted to chime in again and say I appreciate your thoughtful response to my concerns. I also wanted to say I really enjoy your work, even when I don't agree with the commentary and editing decisions. And I look forward to more entries. Thanks, (...) (19 years ago, 13-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
