 | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —John Neal
| | | | (...) Fine, fair friend. (...) Not said. "Say". (...) <hands over ears> LA LA LA LA LA LA LA! (...) It wasn't pointless. (...) Now you seem annoyed. Let's call it even. JOHN (20 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Ross Crawford
| | | | | | (...) Unjustified, maybe, but certainly not pointless... ROSCO (20 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Who the devil are we to lecture on 'nucular' non-proliferation? (careful, long rant) —Richard Parsons
| | | | | (...) Now there is an argument, and close to the best possible riposte under all the circumstances, I think. Seems to sum up Larry and John perfectly in this case. Richard Still baldly going... (20 years ago, 7-May-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| | | | | | |
