Subject:
|
Tolerance...Dave Schuler are you out there?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:16:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
673 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Dave,
Long ago I gave up responding to off-topic debate as I simply don't have the
time to respond to all the tangents, etc. However, I still ocassionally get
sucked into reading some of the threads.
Somehow I've found myself dragged into a debate thread from back in October that
eventually became a discussion of tolerance. In that discussion you said this:
"Additionally, the rejection of intolerance is not, in itself, intolerant."
I find that a fascinating position...can you explain it a little further?
Thanks in advance,
Justin
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Tolerance...Dave Schuler are you out there?
|
| (...) If you preach tolerance, it pretty much mean you are against intolerance. If you want to play a semantics games and call that intolerance of intolerance, I'm sure that one could make an interesting debate of it, but generally, the argument is (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Tolerance...Dave Schuler are you out there?
|
| (...) Hi Justin! Bruce has already given a good answer, but since your question stems from something that I wrote, I'll take a shot, too. Here's my original post, for those readers joining us late: (URL) there are several ways to look at it. For all (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jan-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
