Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 2004 21:51:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9255 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ken Nagel wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Richie Dulin wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ken Nagel wrote:
| |
Except what I know is that Lego is by definition a failure as a company.
|
|
SNIP
| |
A company will often (but not always) seek to give a return to shareholders
-making a profit is but one way of doing this.
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
Except Lego is not publicly owned.
|
You are correct in saying that it is not publically owned, but why do you say
‘except’? It makes no difference.
There are plenty of non publically owned companies that do not exist to make a
profit.
| |
It is owned by people with increasingly less wealth.
|
Is it? How do you know?
Cheers
Richie Dulin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
