Debate : 26500


Off-Topic / Debate / 26500	26499 \| 26501

Subject:	Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Wed, 22 Dec 2004 19:57:28 GMT
Viewed:	28 times

In lugnet.lego, David Koudys wrote:

In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:

In lugnet.lego, J. Spencer Rezkalla wrote:

In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:

SNIP

Which part in there was lieing?

Just becasue you didn’t like what happened, does not give you ‘carte blanc’ to interpret the events the way you wish.

Dave K

I don’t care what happened as far as set numbers. What I do care about is that this was presented as a “Limited Edition of 10,000”. They then proceded to break that promiss. What is your word worth?-Ken

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
(...) Spin. Stop it. 'They' did no such thing as 'break a promise'. Fact--TLC had a limited quantity of Maersk Blue pellets and, with no contract with Maersk at the time, as stated, they were not going to get anymore Maersk Blue pellets to make more (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
(...) Can we please stop with the spin on the situation? There were no lies At the time, no contract with Maersk to make future sets and LEGO had these pellets to get rid of. Come out with nifty set and use up pellets--limited 'cause, as stated by (...) (20 years ago, 22-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search