| |
In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, J. Spencer Rezkalla wrote:
| |
In lugnet.lego, Ken Nagel wrote:
|
SNIP
| |
Perhaps there are different connotations of the term “limited”? SNIP
Spencer
|
No confussion here. They said through Jake M., SHO, and press releases that
it was LIMITED TO 10,000.
I don’t care about collectability. I bought two the first time one for myself
and another for a nephew. I may get another this time.
however I do detest being lied to. the excuse “we changed our minds” is only
an excuse. It does not change the fact that a promise was broken.
After bley and click hinges et. al. some seem to think they are taking the
high road by defending the company no matter what they do. This is sad it’s
not the company doing with their product as they see fit it’s the company
lying to you.-Ken
|
Can we please stop with the spin on the situation? There were no lies
At the time, no contract with Maersk to make future sets and LEGO had these
pellets to get rid of. Come out with nifty set and use up pellets--limited
‘cause, as stated by Jake, et al at TLC, TLC *can’t* make anymore due to no
Maersk Blue pellets. And since, at the time, there was no contract with Maersk
to warrant making more pellets, no more boats after the run was done. Case
closed.
Jump to today--“Hey,” says Maersk, “We want to start a new contract with you
(TLC). We’ll even supply you with the pellets for the colour!”
Which part in there was lieing?
Just becasue you didn’t like what happened, does not give you ‘carte blanc’ to
interpret the events the way you wish.
Dave K
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
