To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25968
25967  |  25969
Subject: 
Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:11:15 GMT
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
1454 times
  
"Lee Meyer" <leemeyer1@compuserve.com> wrote in message
news:I4DGG3.yz4@lugnet.com...

You have to understand that people of faith cannot compartmentalize or • separate
their faith/morality from their decisions.  To say we actively make sure • that
religion has no place in the decision making process makes it a process • that is
inherently hostile towards all people of faith.  ANd I'm not singling out • LUGNET
here, it;s just a specific example.

If one were to base Lugnet decisions on faith, which faith system would one
choose as the basis for those decisions? Would you be happy if the chosen
faith system did not overlap 100% with yours? And finally, is it possible
for a person to have 100% faith system overlap with another?

Jennifer



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
 
(...) Hi Dave, the point I was trying to make was that when you deal with a topic that has moral/religious implications (such as homosexuality), if before the discussion has even begun, you state that religious factors will not be taken into (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR