To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25821
25820  |  25822
Subject: 
Re: Lavender Brick Society
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 03:07:04 GMT
Viewed: 
55 times
  
In lugnet.fun.community, Kevin Wilson wrote:
In lugnet.fun.community, Bruce Schlickbernd wrote:

I won't swear to it, but I think that puts you in the Pit of People Condemned to
read Reader's Digest for All Eternity.  If it didn't have any sugar in addition
to being decaffienated, you'd simply be an atheist.

Oh well, no worries :-)  Shocking thought it may be, I *like* Readers Digest.
Anything with words on a page can't be all bad, right?

I always liked my mother's succinct summation of Reader's Digest: premasticated
literature.  But I must admit, the Groucho Marx Dilemma would be woise (Help,
help, let me out of here!  At least throw me a magazine).

Locked in a bathroom for eternity with nothing to read but the laxative labels.
Brrrrrrrrrr.

-->Bruce<--



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Lavender Brick Society
 
(...) Oh well, no worries :-) Shocking thought it may be, I *like* Readers Digest. Anything with words on a page can't be all bad, right? It could have been worse. It could have been the same cornflake package for all eternity. At least with RD I (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

207 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR