| |
> >
> > > BL needs Lar (to be seen accomodated) more than Lar needs BL (to accomodate him)
> >
> > If that's the case, then BL should definitely get rid of Lar. Why should the
> > service provider be forced to smooch the posterior of someone who deliberately
> > subverted the stated policies of the provider, regardless of how much weight
> > the seller's name is perceived to carry? Additionally, it cannot be
> > overlooked that in his role here on LUGNET Lar has gone to admirable lengths
> > to enforce the TOS as it applies to proper posting venues and subject matter
> > of posts, and on many occasions he posts mid-thread to call for an FUT.
> > Therefore it is far more poignant when he chooses to subvert the spirit of
> > Bricklink's TOS.
>
>
>
> I think that the point Suz was trying to make is that often Lar is right. When
> Lar sees a problem, he doesn't stay quiet and live with it. He tried to fix the
> problem. In this case, he used something like civil disobedience to make a
> point.
Is that not rather ironic given his willingness to enforce the ToS on this site?
>
> It's not because it is "The Great Lar++", it is because Larry is consistently
> acting in the best interest of the community.
hmm.
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
