To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25419
25418  |  25420
Subject: 
Re: suspended Bricklink shops
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:46:35 GMT
Viewed: 
1430 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tim Courtney wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Jason Spears wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mark Papenfuss wrote:
   I think you are wrong. Dan owes nobody a reason. Dan does not NEED to explain why he runs his site the way he does. And people are going to think what they want to no matter what is said.. proof of that is already easy to see.

If he doesn’t explain himself and continues to run his business (1) like a crazed dictator than other users may worry that continued investment in BrickLink is not going to yeild returns.

I have a lot of respect for Dan and what he does at BL, to call him a “crazed dictator” is silly.

   Examples - I’ve been pondering re-opening my Bricklink store, but I don’t want to do all the work necessary, if at some random moment, Dan may decide to boot me. Also as a customer, I have completely sworn off some stores (2) due to their business practices, if they cannot treat the customer in a professional manner, than I’ll take my money elsewhere. Alas there isn’t a real viable alternative to BL right now.

...because Dan saw a simple idea which he invested his time and cash in. Anyone else could have done the same (e.g Todd), but only Dan actually had the gumption to do it. Bricklink has revolutionised some aspects of this hobby; for that Dan deserves your thanks - not your contempt!

Dan deserves quite a bit of thanks for what he’s done. However, unlike many sites, BL was created as a business venture rather than a totally benevolent effort. People pay Dan to list their wares, they’re buying a service. If Dan knows what’s good for his business, he should (theoretically) resolve disputes and issues with his good-faith customers amicably.

Even when a seller deliberately continues to break the ToS, and as a result potentially disenfranchises buyers?

  
Fortunately for Dan (but arguably unfortunately for Lar and others in the community who have clashes with him) he has a monopoly on this type of brickshop site. Sure, you can argue that there are other places to sell LEGO online -- but *none* that come close to comparing with the power and features of BL. Anyways, the point being - Dan is free to run his site *like* a crazed dictator (not calling him one, but likening actions) and not see the immediate consequences of lost customers to a close competitor. However, this action may prove far more damaging to his business in the long run should disgruntled customers decide to compete.

Perhaps somebody should compete? One could argue that BL is too big now, and that a basic “sets only” or “minifig only” facility on LUNGET, Brickset or Peeron (linked to their respective set databases) may be viable?

Scott A

  
-Tim



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: suspended Bricklink shops
 
(...) Dan deserves quite a bit of thanks for what he's done. However, unlike many sites, BL was created as a business venture rather than a totally benevolent effort. People pay Dan to list their wares, they're buying a service. If Dan knows what's (...) (20 years ago, 23-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR