Subject:
|
Re: Taking the bait (was Re: Fair use and allusion?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:03:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1029 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
> Lar said:
(much snippage)
> True, but as I mentioned, you have a habit of demanding precise documentation
> from your opponents, while you seem to feel yourself exempt from that same
> requirement. It's not a formal debating society, but we [have] established
> general standards of discourse. Among those standards I would include a
> basic sauce-for-the-goose policy: if you make a demand of your opponent, you
> should accept the same demand when it is made upon you.
Ok, fair enough. I will try to do better going forward.
> > If I so failed to distinguish then I erred. I thought it was clear but
> > perhaps it wasn't. If that's the real meat of your argument, and you're
> > ready to admit that Moore may in fact do disservice to causes he espouses,
> > then I'll gladly admit that point so we can move on.
>
> Admit that he ["may"] do disservice? Sure, why not? The word "may" leaves
> me with plausible deniability later, after all.
Here's someone else that just popped up making the same, or a similar, point.
http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/article_of_the_week/0622_fahrenheit_911_playing_into_bush_strategy.html
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
