To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 24542
24541  |  24543
Subject: 
Re: Fair use and allusion?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 14:06:32 GMT
Viewed: 
848 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:

   It is my understanding that MM choose to include 4 separate instances of the expletive that rhymes with “another trucker”

Hot off the presses! Our Copresident seems to embrace a colorful rhetorical style that could cause he Congressional record to lose its “PG” rating.

I wonder--will Cheney be forced by the FCC to pay an unreasonably huge fine because of his on-air profanity? If not, then why not?

Dave!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Fair use and allusion?
 
(...) Leahy could induce even the Pope to curse;-) JOHN (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Fair use and allusion?
 
(...) (snip) (...) I think your analogy is faulty. The group is specifically concerned about TV commercial time. (...) I can't remember where I heard this, and my attempts to locate the info were unsuccessful. Let me get back to you on that if I (...) (20 years ago, 25-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR