Subject:
|
Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:27:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
853 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
Ray Bradbury is fired up about
the title of Michael Moore’s forthcoming film. Regardless of your opinion
of Moore or of Bradbury, it seems to me that this complaint is largely based
on nothing. Bradbury’s
Farenheit 451 is a copyrighted work, to be sure, but it seems to me that the
laws protecting satire & parody should easily trump Bradbury’s objection to
Moore’s allusive use of the title. I suppose an issue could be made in that
Bradbury was apparently made to expect an explanatory phone call from Moore,
but beyond that...?
Thoughts?
|
What is Ray whining about? It gives some attention to his book, and parodies of
an actual book/film/play titles are a long standing tradition in this country.
-->Bruce<--
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Fair use and allusion?
|
| (...) As Ray himself knows very well! A LUGNET member-at-large reminded me that Bradbury's (URL) Wicked This Way Comes> is itself a rip-off of (URL) an earlier work.> Pedants and kneejerk anti-Moore zealots will no doubt observe that Shakespeare was (...) (20 years ago, 22-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Fair use and allusion?
|
| Ray Bradbury is fired up about (URL) title of Michael Moore's forthcoming film.> Regardless of your opinion of Moore or of Bradbury, it seems to me that this complaint is largely based on nothing. Bradbury's (URL) 451> is a copyrighted work, to be (...) (20 years ago, 21-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
106 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
