Subject:
|
Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:46:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2525 times
|
| |
|
|
Given that explanation, I think we both agree that discussion of "inherent
rights" must assume that it is a social/legal construct. And that discussions
of these general topics might be better served focussing on "inherent
preferences." At least sometimes. But I'm not sure where to take this, now.
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
|
| (...) This is a very nice summation, overall. (...) A good distinction to bear in mind. I don't think I have the ammunition to prove my case scientifically, so I should probably say I'm aiming for the philosophical angle. To clarify: By "inherent (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
