Subject:
|
Re: Question for the sane out there
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 05:52:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1435 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
>
> > > Oh, come now! I think everyone knows I was being facetious.
> > > If anyone feels disenfranchised by my jest, please let me know,
> > > and I'll make amends.
> >
> > I resent the fact that you're painting with such a broad brush.
> > Just because I agree with you on this issue, doesn't make me sane.
> > :-)
>
> Nor, for that matter, does it necessarily follow that sanity is
> possessed by Dave!
And your insistence on the distinction implies that there is some doubt as to
Dave!'s sanity.
I am prepared to vouch Dave!'s sanity.
(Mwa ha ha ha. MWA HA Ha ha.)
Then again, I think pretty much everyone is sane. Even the folks John
habitually thinks of as psychotic seem to make consummate sense to me.
To the extent that views on other people's sanity actually matter much...
Richard
Still baldly going...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Question for the sane out there
|
| (...) It was a clever, logical twist on the assertion of Dave! (a joke) (...) Well, from your statement below, that's not saying much. (...) ??? Except those who aren't? (...) "Consummate sense"? Explain and cite please. Are you saying that the (...) (20 years ago, 7-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
218 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
