To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23859
23858  |  23860
Subject: 
wise counsel?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 29 Apr 2004 18:31:07 GMT
Viewed: 
163 times
  
Bush: “I was never advised by my counsel to not answer anything. I answered every question they asked”

That’s kind of a given; not something to brag about. Was it his counsel who suggested he should not answer questions under oath, or that the Vice-“President” should hold his hand while he “answered every question they asked”?

Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: wise counsel?
 
(...) Hey, give credit where it's due! At his last press conference, Dubya didn't answer a single question. To go from zero to "every question" is quite a shift. It's just a pity he's not under oath. Of course, Scott McClellan harumphed that Bush (...) (20 years ago, 29-Apr-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR