To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23386
23385  |  23387
Subject: 
Philosophy According to Franklin -- What is a Box?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:42:27 GMT
Viewed: 
301 times
  
What is a box?  Seems like a simple question, so it outh to have a simple
answer...

Let's start with a basic definition -- a box is a rectangular solid; that is, a
three-dimensional object having six sides (or "faces"), each of which is a
rectangle.  It also has twelve edgelines -- four surrounding the top face, four
more around the bottom, and another four which can be imagined as columns
supporting the top face in position over the bottom face.

Suppose we take away one of the faces -- let's say, the top face.  Is this
object still a box?  I would say, yes it is.  I can use this object, by putting
things into it, and carry the box around, making it easier for me to carry the
things inside the box (as opposed to carrying these things individually).

OK, suppose we take away another face -- let's say, the bottom one, the one
opposite the face we previously deleted.  Is this object still a box?  I'd say,
probably yes, but it depends.  I cannot carry anything inside this object, so
it's of no utility in that respect.  But, if it's large enough, I can place it
on the floor, and some children can use it as a "fort."

What if we take away any more faces?  Would this object still be a box?  I'd
say, no...

In the case of a three-sided object, where two of the faces are opposite each
other, I'd call this a "screen" (as in a "dice screen" or a "game master's
screen," a term understandable to most gamers).

And in the case of two adjacent faces, I'd call this a "flap" or a "fold."  A
fold is a _very_ common structure in _origami_ (Japanese paper-folding art), but
a fold does _not_, in and of itself, constitute a box.

So, in summation, I'd say that an object _must_ have _at_least_ four faces to be
considered a "box."  (But that's just my opinion -- I could be wrong... ;)



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Philosophy According to Franklin -- What is a Box?
 
(...) (Sorry for the spelling error...) (20 years ago, 19-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR