|
|
 | | Re: Yeah, thats what trademarks are for
|
| (...) I thought it wasn't legally possible to trademark generic terms. This would be like McDonalds tradmarking the term 'hamburger'. Allister (22 years ago, 21-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Yeah, thats what trademarks are for
|
| (URL) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We're here to go
|
| (...) I don't have any problem with pursuing that end of the discussion, but I wasn't trying to kick of a debate with my original question. If it winds up there, though, I say groovy! I enjoyed that previous debate re: cost-value of space (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We're here to go
|
| (...) I'm a big fan of space exploration. I'm an even bigger fan of universal state funded healthcare & education. Who in society will benifit most from a manned trip to Mars? Who in society benifits most from a lack of universal state funded (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: We're here to go
|
| (...) Well, there's expensive and there's *VERY expensive*, in terms of dollars per unit of work on task. Asserting that NASA falls into the latter camp (as I do) is debate fodder, so if you want to stay out of .debate, as you seem to, we won't get (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jan-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
