 | | Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | Why should the U.S. engage in these activities in the first place? The fact that people placed highly in goverment are probably reaping some kind of on/offshore monitary benefit only makes it worse. I am also non-patisan on the issue -- Clinton (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | Followup to yesterday: "The two faces of Rumsfeld" (URL) director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea 2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change (...) (21 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | great front page [Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) this misjudgement by Sharon: Gaza visitors must sign waiver in case army shoots them (URL) story I expect the child killers in the IDF will be happy to read] (...) I partly agree. But I think part of the problem is that he feels obliged to (...) (21 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
