 | | Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK
|
|
Why should the U.S. engage in these activities in the first place? The fact that people placed highly in goverment are probably reaping some kind of on/offshore monitary benefit only makes it worse. I am also non-patisan on the issue -- Clinton (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK
|
|
Followup to yesterday: "The two faces of Rumsfeld" (URL) director of a company which wins $200m contract to sell nuclear reactors to North Korea 2002: declares North Korea a terrorist state, part of the axis of evil and a target for regime change (...) (22 years ago, 10-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | great front page [Re: Having it both ways W.R.T. DPRK]
|
|
(...) this misjudgement by Sharon: Gaza visitors must sign waiver in case army shoots them (URL) story I expect the child killers in the IDF will be happy to read] (...) I partly agree. But I think part of the problem is that he feels obliged to (...) (22 years ago, 11-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
