 | | Re: One more reason why I'm refusing to shop in Wal*Mart —Bruce Schlickbernd
| | | | (...) You're misusing the term "straw man" as, ironically, a straw man argument. Non-applicable, a non-sequitor, too obscure, suspect TV "philosophy", perhaps. A straw man argument: The author attacks an argument which is different from, and usually (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: One more reason why I'm refusing to shop in Wal*Mart —Richard Marchetti
| | | | | | (...) Funny. Another "John Neal" moment for debate I guess. -- Hop-Frog (22 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: One more reason why I'm refusing to shop in Wal*Mart —John Neal
| | | | | (...) I don't think so. I attacked the quotation. *He* transferred my attack and applied to the author himself (whom I don't even know). That wasn't my point. (...) I think the coined phrase is "fictitious";-) (...) Of course. That is the way it (...) (22 years ago, 7-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | | |
