Debate : 20624


Off-Topic / Debate / 20624	20623 \| 20625

Subject:	Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:34:56 GMT
Viewed:	126 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: > The consequences for Tim Robbins' recent unpopular ramblings are miniscule > compared to the potential humiliation MM faces if the Academy is convinced > that his "documentary" Bowling For Columbine is in fact not eligible under > its own rules for qualification. ROFL! Humiliation? Don't you think he'd enjoy the publicity? Cheers Richie

Message has 2 Replies:

		Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
(...) That's the downside of this, yes, but preventing future budding Moores from winning might be worth the cost. (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

		Re: "Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
(...) He is so far removed from reality that he probably would. I believe that a normal person, having some semblance of dignity and pride, would be horrified were it to happen to them. But the fact would remain that we would be laughing at him, (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:

		"Fictitious Presidency"? How about "Fictitious Oscar"?
The consequences for Tim Robbins' recent unpopular ramblings are miniscule compared to the potential humiliation MM faces if the Academy is convinced that his "documentary" Bowling For Columbine is in fact not eligible under its own rules for (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

6 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search