Subject:
|
Re: Libertarianism again.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 4 Sep 1999 16:37:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpieniazek@novera&stopspammers&.com
|
Viewed:
|
1847 times
|
| |
|
|
<37CD5AB2.72BA98B6@voyager.net> <FHJ1Ao.D6D@lugnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Moz (Chris Moseley) wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote
> > Simon, don't argue from authority. • ..
> > Heck, just about everything in the classic Samuelson text has been
> > shown to be untrue, along with the rest of Keysnian economics.
>
> Larry, heed thyself. Or is simple contradiction permitted?
Simon made a sweeping statement that "economics" had said X. I merely
showed that not all economics did say X. Some said specifically X is
false and here is why.
Now, it so happpens I've read a fair bit of economics and I made up my
own mind about what I feel is true and verifiable, and I came down on
the not X side. I am definitely not arguing from authority.
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ Member ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to
lugnet.
NOTE: I have left CTP, effective 18 June 99, and my CTP email
will not work after then. Please switch to my Novera ID.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Libertarianism again.
|
| was: Re: Misperceptions of America (Was: Conversation w/ a LEGO Rep) Mike Stanley <cjc@NOSPAMnewsguy.com> wrote in (...) I can, but none of them strike me as realistic. The scenario itself seems to be more or less believable, in the sense that it (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
276 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
